Subtillis QA/QC
The small discrepancy.
The bigger consequence.
A pipe changes size between disciplines. A room’s airflow conflicts with its pressure requirement. A load exceeds the power shown in a schedule. These are the details a review needs to connect.
Get a free drawing reviewSame connection. Different pipe sizes.
The civil utility plan shows a 6-inch service where the plumbing plan shows 4 inches. Reconcile the connection size before this becomes a field coordination issue.
01 / Drawing coordination
Read across
discipline boundaries.
Coordination issues live where scopes meet. Subtillis checks related information across drawings to identify conflicting sizes, dimensions, elevations, and requirements.
- Civil and plumbing connections that disagree on pipe size or elevation.
- Plans, details, and schedules that describe the same condition differently.
- Missing details that leave part of the design unresolved, including landscape documentation.
02 / Specification review
The written requirement
belongs in the review.
Drawings and specifications describe the project together. Subtillis checks the relationship between them, looking for discrepancies in materials, assemblies, and performance requirements.
- A material called out on a detail that conflicts with the specification.
- Assembly information that differs between the graphic and written documents.
- Requirements that need to be reconciled before the documents are issued.
03 / Technical and code review
Look beyond
matching the labels.
Some issues require evaluating what the documented design implies. Customer reviews have identified room airflow and pressure concerns, underpowered devices, and current that warrants review against conductor sizing.
- Technical relationships within mechanical and electrical schedules.
- Potential code issues in the context of the project’s requirements.
- Conditions that need the designer’s judgment, further calculation, or clarification.
Code editions, local amendments, and project conditions matter. Establish the applicable requirements and review the finding in that context.
04 / Prioritization
A thorough review.
A useful order of work.
Finding more is only useful if your team can see what deserves attention. Subtillis distinguishes issues, suggestions, and corrections, and helps reviewers prioritize the findings that matter to the project.
- Investigate the finding with its source revision and sheet location.
- Evaluate the supporting evidence against the design intent.
- Accept the finding, dismiss it, or mark it fixed as your team works through the review.
Your review team stays in control.
Subtillis supports professional review. AI can miss an issue or flag an intentional condition. Your architects and engineers evaluate the results, resolve the design, and determine whether the documents are ready to issue. A review does not certify completeness or code compliance.
A free review. Your drawings.
See what’s in your set.
Before it’s in the field.
Start with a conversation about your firm and the drawings you want reviewed. We’ll agree on the scope, review the documents, and walk you through the findings in a follow-up meeting.
Get a free drawing review Initial conversation → Drawing review → Findings meeting